That isn’t a typo, of the 25,407 households in Maidenhead, 10,167
of those properties don’t only have one spare bedroom, but two spare bedrooms!
… and it is this topic I want to talk about this week, my Maidenhead Property Market
Blog readers – because this could be the cure for Maidenhead’s housing crisis. The fundamental problem of the Maidenhead housing
‘crisis’, is the fact that the supply of homes to live in has not historically
met demand, increasing property values (and in turn rents), thus ensuring home
ownership becomes an unattainable ambition for the twenty something’s of Maidenhead.
Call me a realist, but it’s obvious that either demand needs
to drop or supply needs to rise to stop this trend getting worse for the
generations to come. Don’t get me wrong,
I admire Downing Street’s plans to build 200,000 starter homes which will be
offered to first time buyers under 40 with a minimum 20% discount price. However, the building of starter homes on current
building sites, where new homes builders already have to build a certain number
of affordable ‘starter’ homes at the moment under a different scheme, does not
increase the stock of new ‘starter’ homes, it simply replaces one affordable scheme
with another.
One option that could resolve the housing crisis is if the
Government literally looked closer to home, concentrating on matching
households with the appropriate sized home.
In Maidenhead, 18,390 households have one spare bedroom and
of these, 10,167 have two or more spare bedrooms.
This compares to 1,055 households in Maidenhead that are
overcrowded (i.e. there are more people than bedrooms in the property).
Looking specifically at the homeowners of Maidenhead, 6,061
owner occupied Maidenhead houses have one spare bedroom. Now having a spare bedroom is not considered
a luxury. However, in addition to those 6,061
households with one spare bedroom, there are on top, a further 9,187 owner
occupied Maidenhead households with two or more spare bedrooms.
Therefore, I am beginning to see there is the spare capacity
in the Maidenhead housing market. Principally,
I will concentrate on the group that makes up the bulk of this category, the
owner occupiers of large properties, in their 60’s and 70’s, where the kids
flew the nest back in the 80’s and 90’s.
They call it ‘downsizing’, when you sell a big property, where the extra
bedrooms are no longer required, to move into a smaller and, usually, less expensive
property.
However, there are many explanations why these individuals
do not downsize. These people have lived in the same house for
30, 40 even 50 years, and as one matures in life, many people do not want to depart
from what they see as the family home. Much
time has been invested in making friends in the area and it’s nice to have all
those rooms in case every grandchild decided to visit, at the same time, and
they brought their friends! But on a
more serious note, more and more people are beginning to downsize earlier, but in
my opinion, not at a fast enough rate. As
the years go one, we will have a situation where younger families will be
living in smaller and smaller houses, whilst all the large houses with a couple
of 70 something empty-nesters rattling around them! I believe the Government should put more weight
behind downsizing, because with the right incentives, many could be encouraged
to think again and make the spare rooms available.
.. and it would have to be incentives, as the using the
stick (instead of the carrot) would be political suicide for any party,
especially the Tory’s. One option is to
allow retired downsizers not to pay stamp duty on the new property, saving them
thousands of pounds and another for the planners to work with builders to build
not only starter homes for under 40’s, but also have housing built just for
retired downsizers ... or is this one step too far in ‘social engineering’?
No comments:
Post a Comment